<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Validate CSS style &#8220;opacity&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/</link>
	<description>The personal pages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Frederick Oliver		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-101460</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Frederick Oliver]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-101460</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Actually, it doesnÂ´t validate... not in xhtml 1.0 strict anyway...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it doesnÂ´t validate&#8230; not in xhtml 1.0 strict anyway&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sanaldus		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-100085</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanaldus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-100085</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[once you have that in place create a very simple css file named opacity.css with your opacity css in it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>once you have that in place create a very simple css file named opacity.css with your opacity css in it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: feroz		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-97532</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[feroz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 04:36:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-97532</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;This is good article. but I&#039;m not sure if user disable java script in browser than the CSS will affect page or not .&lt;/strong&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This is good article. but I&#8217;m not sure if user disable java script in browser than the CSS will affect page or not .</strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Flipbook Movies with jQuery &#124; Jon Raasch&#8217;s Blog		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-69452</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Flipbook Movies with jQuery &#124; Jon Raasch&#8217;s Blog]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 17:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-69452</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] z-indexes to allow the fade effect to run smoothly. If you are not using this effect, feel free to remove the opacity values so that the CSS validates. Just replace opacity: 0.0 with display: none and opacity: 1.0 with display: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] z-indexes to allow the fade effect to run smoothly. If you are not using this effect, feel free to remove the opacity values so that the CSS validates. Just replace opacity: 0.0 with display: none and opacity: 1.0 with display: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Make Entrecard and Sociable Valid &#124; Ever After		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-45576</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Make Entrecard and Sociable Valid &#124; Ever After]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 19:03:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-45576</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] specific (-moz-opacity) or haven&#8217;t been approved as standard css yet. There is a way to use javascript to get around it, but it doesn&#8217;t solve the issue of changing opacity on hover. So my solution? Remove the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] specific (-moz-opacity) or haven&#8217;t been approved as standard css yet. There is a way to use javascript to get around it, but it doesn&#8217;t solve the issue of changing opacity on hover. So my solution? Remove the [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dustin		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-45372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:24:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-45372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i forgot to explain how it works ... very simple validator is not a browser so it skips over the conditions...

also it looks like my example didnt make it into the previous post...
&lt;a href=&quot;http://fade2clear.com/opacity.txt&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here is a link to a text file you can view&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i forgot to explain how it works &#8230; very simple validator is not a browser so it skips over the conditions&#8230;</p>
<p>also it looks like my example didnt make it into the previous post&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://fade2clear.com/opacity.txt" rel="nofollow">here is a link to a text file you can view</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Dustin		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-45371</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dustin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 00:16:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-45371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Here is a simple method to get your css and xhtml to validate without the use of javascript. I am a firm believer that everything that can be done server side should be so here is a simple php solution.

the document.write solution is not a great idea because it keeps your xhtml from validating...this php php you have to do per browser but i have included all the major browsers in the example. this code works great in an include. for an example you can take a look at my site



once you have that in place create a very simple css file named opacity.css with your opacity css in it]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is a simple method to get your css and xhtml to validate without the use of javascript. I am a firm believer that everything that can be done server side should be so here is a simple php solution.</p>
<p>the document.write solution is not a great idea because it keeps your xhtml from validating&#8230;this php php you have to do per browser but i have included all the major browsers in the example. this code works great in an include. for an example you can take a look at my site</p>
<p>once you have that in place create a very simple css file named opacity.css with your opacity css in it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-39997</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:27:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-39997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Can you provide a link to a test page? It&#039;s always easier to answer these questions when I can review the source myself...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can you provide a link to a test page? It&#8217;s always easier to answer these questions when I can review the source myself&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: zac		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-39919</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[zac]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 02:27:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-39919</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi.. cool trick.. my CSS validates... however funny thing is now my HTML doesn&#039;t  :P

I get this error message:

&lt;blockquote&gt;

The element named above was found in a context where it is not allowed. This could mean that you have incorrectly nested elements -- such as a &quot;style&quot; element in the &quot;body&quot; section instead of inside &quot;head&quot; -- or two elements that overlap (which is not allowed).

One common cause for this error is the use of XHTML syntax in HTML documents. Due to HTML&#039;s rules of implicitly closed elements, this error can create cascading effects. For instance, using XHTML&#039;s &quot;self-closing&quot; tags for &quot;meta&quot; and &quot;link&quot; in the &quot;head&quot; section of a HTML document may cause the parser to infer the end of the &quot;head&quot; section and the beginning of the &quot;body&quot; section (where &quot;link&quot; and &quot;meta&quot; are not allowed; hence the reported error).
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I put this code up in the head of the doc:
&lt;code&gt;hmm my code isnt showing up


document.write(&#039;&#039;);
&lt;/code&gt;

Anyways, it is just what you have up there.. pasted before the end head tag
Any ideas about why this doesn&#039;t work?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi.. cool trick.. my CSS validates&#8230; however funny thing is now my HTML doesn&#8217;t  😛</p>
<p>I get this error message:</p>
<blockquote>
<p>The element named above was found in a context where it is not allowed. This could mean that you have incorrectly nested elements &#8212; such as a &#8220;style&#8221; element in the &#8220;body&#8221; section instead of inside &#8220;head&#8221; &#8212; or two elements that overlap (which is not allowed).</p>
<p>One common cause for this error is the use of XHTML syntax in HTML documents. Due to HTML&#8217;s rules of implicitly closed elements, this error can create cascading effects. For instance, using XHTML&#8217;s &#8220;self-closing&#8221; tags for &#8220;meta&#8221; and &#8220;link&#8221; in the &#8220;head&#8221; section of a HTML document may cause the parser to infer the end of the &#8220;head&#8221; section and the beginning of the &#8220;body&#8221; section (where &#8220;link&#8221; and &#8220;meta&#8221; are not allowed; hence the reported error).
</p></blockquote>
<p>I put this code up in the head of the doc:<br />
<code>hmm my code isnt showing up</p>
<p>document.write('');<br />
</code></p>
<p>Anyways, it is just what you have up there.. pasted before the end head tag<br />
Any ideas about why this doesn&#8217;t work?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sanallinkler Bilgi ArÅŸivi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 31 AralÄ±k 2007 Web'den SeÃ§me Haberler		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-33014</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sanallinkler Bilgi ArÅŸivi &#187; Blog Archive &#187; 31 AralÄ±k 2007 Web'den SeÃ§me Haberler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 00:32:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-33014</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] DoÄŸrulanmÄ±ÅŸ CSS ile saydamlaÅŸtÄ±rma Ã¶zelliÄŸi eklemek. BilindiÄŸi gibi opacity Ã¶zelliÄŸinin farklÄ± tarayÄ±cÄ±lardaki kodu W3C validator&#8217;dan geÃ§miyor, CSS3 ile bu durum dÃ¼zeltilmiÅŸ olsa bile, ÅŸimdilik burada anlatÄ±lan metot mantÄ±klÄ±. BaÄŸlantÄ± [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] DoÄŸrulanmÄ±ÅŸ CSS ile saydamlaÅŸtÄ±rma Ã¶zelliÄŸi eklemek. BilindiÄŸi gibi opacity Ã¶zelliÄŸinin farklÄ± tarayÄ±cÄ±lardaki kodu W3C validator&#8217;dan geÃ§miyor, CSS3 ile bu durum dÃ¼zeltilmiÅŸ olsa bile, ÅŸimdilik burada anlatÄ±lan metot mantÄ±klÄ±. BaÄŸlantÄ± [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MooCow		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-32752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MooCow]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:25:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-32752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well, since opacity is supposed to be part of CSS3, I&#039;d rather have my style sheet not validate (which I can easily explain to my clients) then having an ugly javascript work-around that won&#039;t work if javascript is disabled.

As for IE6/IE7, conditional comments and different style sheets takes care of them.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, since opacity is supposed to be part of CSS3, I&#8217;d rather have my style sheet not validate (which I can easily explain to my clients) then having an ugly javascript work-around that won&#8217;t work if javascript is disabled.</p>
<p>As for IE6/IE7, conditional comments and different style sheets takes care of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Fatih HayrioÄŸlu&#8217;nun not defteri &#187; 31 AralÄ±k 2007 Web&#8217;den SeÃ§me Haberler		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-30845</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fatih HayrioÄŸlu&#8217;nun not defteri &#187; 31 AralÄ±k 2007 Web&#8217;den SeÃ§me Haberler]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 09:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-30845</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[...] DoÄŸrulanmÄ±ÅŸ CSS ile saydamlaÅŸtÄ±rma Ã¶zelliÄŸi eklemek. BilindiÄŸi gibi opacity Ã¶zelliÄŸinin farklÄ± tarayÄ±cÄ±lardaki kodu W3C validator&#8217;dan geÃ§miyor, CSS3 ile bu durum dÃ¼zeltilmiÅŸ olsa bile, ÅŸimdilik burada anlatÄ±lan metot mantÄ±klÄ±. BaÄŸlantÄ± [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] DoÄŸrulanmÄ±ÅŸ CSS ile saydamlaÅŸtÄ±rma Ã¶zelliÄŸi eklemek. BilindiÄŸi gibi opacity Ã¶zelliÄŸinin farklÄ± tarayÄ±cÄ±lardaki kodu W3C validator&#8217;dan geÃ§miyor, CSS3 ile bu durum dÃ¼zeltilmiÅŸ olsa bile, ÅŸimdilik burada anlatÄ±lan metot mantÄ±klÄ±. BaÄŸlantÄ± [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-22285</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:05:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-22285</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[On the contrary. Neglecting markup validation IS big brother politics. Furthermore, most people doesn&#039;t know (or have the time) to correct all errors and warnings.

Creating according to standards is merely done to illustrate that you a) have the skills required b) care about your audience c) and most likely are a perfectionist...

Why people constantly seams to get upset because someone provides insight and/or solutions to validating issues is beyond me. Shouldn&#039;t you rather be focussing on all those giant internet portals that doesn&#039;t give a s***!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the contrary. Neglecting markup validation IS big brother politics. Furthermore, most people doesn&#8217;t know (or have the time) to correct all errors and warnings.</p>
<p>Creating according to standards is merely done to illustrate that you a) have the skills required b) care about your audience c) and most likely are a perfectionist&#8230;</p>
<p>Why people constantly seams to get upset because someone provides insight and/or solutions to validating issues is beyond me. Shouldn&#8217;t you rather be focussing on all those giant internet portals that doesn&#8217;t give a s***!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: tezla		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-22248</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tezla]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:51:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-22248</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[have you guys tried validating the dominant search engine?

&quot;Failed validation, 30 Errors&quot;

what about the #1 internet portal?

&quot;Failed validation, 34 Errors&quot;

and yet everybody and their grandma uses these two services every day without issue. yet another proof that markup validation is big brother politics that most people just don&#039;t bother with.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>have you guys tried validating the dominant search engine?</p>
<p>&#8220;Failed validation, 30 Errors&#8221;</p>
<p>what about the #1 internet portal?</p>
<p>&#8220;Failed validation, 34 Errors&#8221;</p>
<p>and yet everybody and their grandma uses these two services every day without issue. yet another proof that markup validation is big brother politics that most people just don&#8217;t bother with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Thomas		</title>
		<link>https://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/comment-page-1/#comment-13039</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Thomas]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/validate-css-style-opacity/#comment-13039</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It would work, only you&#039;re missing out on the transparency effect... which is the whole point with this workaround.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would work, only you&#8217;re missing out on the transparency effect&#8230; which is the whole point with this workaround.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
