<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DirectX 9 vs DirectX 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/</link>
	<description>The personal pages</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 16:58:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: somebody</title>
		<link>http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/comment-page-1/#comment-50683</link>
		<dc:creator>somebody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 22:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/#comment-50683</guid>
		<description>I think that the mixed up the pictures, the one labled direct x 10 looks like what i got when i play on direct x 9. cause the i remember the trees having coloured ribbions around them, when im in water,when i play on direct x 9. the graphics on crysis still looked pretty good on dx9.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the mixed up the pictures, the one labled direct x 10 looks like what i got when i play on direct x 9. cause the i remember the trees having coloured ribbions around them, when im in water,when i play on direct x 9. the graphics on crysis still looked pretty good on dx9.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Raven</title>
		<link>http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/comment-page-1/#comment-28993</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Raven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2007 12:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/#comment-28993</guid>
		<description>I really love computers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really love computers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristjan</title>
		<link>http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/comment-page-1/#comment-20350</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 20:26:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/#comment-20350</guid>
		<description>gaming can be LOT of fun even without dx10... try need for speed pro street ;)
it works all-high even on my 7600gt :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gaming can be LOT of fun even without dx10&#8230; try need for speed pro street <img src='http://blog.evaria.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
it works all-high even on my 7600gt <img src='http://blog.evaria.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas</title>
		<link>http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/comment-page-1/#comment-20235</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/#comment-20235</guid>
		<description>Yes  it looks like gaming is going to be fun - only problem is that I will have to upgrade my PC to really take advantage of it... :&#124;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes  it looks like gaming is going to be fun &#8211; only problem is that I will have to upgrade my PC to really take advantage of it&#8230; <img src='http://blog.evaria.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_neutral.gif' alt=':|' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kristjan</title>
		<link>http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/comment-page-1/#comment-20224</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristjan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 14:11:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.evaria.com/2007/directx-9-vs-directx-10/#comment-20224</guid>
		<description>OMG! Look the chromatic aberation on trees 8)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OMG! Look the chromatic aberation on trees <img src='http://blog.evaria.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
